Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Stefan Mayer-Kahlen comments on his victory...

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 11:31:38 01/13/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 13, 2004 at 10:59:52, Steve Maughan wrote:

>Martin,
>
>>translated this means about this: "fritz and shredder played the best chess in
>>this tournament (he is comparing against junior and brutus), and won their
>>games against the outsiders most easily" - i don't really mind the first part
>>of this sentence, but the second part is really hilarious given the shredder-
>>jonny incident!
>
>I don't really want to start up the whole Graz scandle thread but in the Jonny
>game Shredder was easily winning.

Pardon me, you mean easily winning? And why SHREDDER didn't win (easily)? Why
had it won with the aid of someone who threw a whole game although it was a
draw? Could you explain your position? If you are a chessplayer yourself, could
you reflect your position in relation to possible cases of a PATT or THREEFOLD?
Would you dare to say that such draws are not existing because they are most
unfair to the side which has a won game????

Do you mean that if you call something a "bug", that then this is like
'unimportant' or 'non-existent'?

So, if I allow a draw by a PATT for instance, that then I couzld say that I had
a bug and then I would still be judged as an extremely strong player? And my
opponents would throw their game just to let me wi??? Where is this being
played. Please tell me exact address.




>The scandle occured due to a bug in Shredder.
> So if SMK is commenting on the general quality of chess played by the programs
>(which he seems to be) I don't really have a problem and I think he's correct.
>

The "general" quality of the chess is something SMK is completely impotent to
judge. SMK has no chess master status whatsoever. Probably he's a good
businessman as Daniel pointed out, but his thought process is really biased
heavily. Please do not speak of chess in general if you talk about the actual
computerchess with BOOKS and TABLES, which is cheating after the FIDE Laws.

Rolf




>Regards,
>
>Steve



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.