Author: margolies,marc
Date: 23:04:04 01/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
in order for an answer to be 'elegant,' it must also be the truth. On January 13, 2004 at 02:15:40, Brian Thomas wrote: >On January 12, 2004 at 23:45:32, margolies,marc wrote: > >>I was refering to your own opinion of terse posters. Has it changed then? > >Actually I thought you meant that complimentary: terse meaning smoothly elegant. > However, personally speaking, if someone asks a question and the answer is no, >a simple no typically suffices (though, after being intrigued by the question I >followed up with a possible workaround). Why be excessively verbose? > >A 'yes' may be all that is necessary, as well, although when people ask if >something is possible, the implied question is often, "How?" > >Still holding grudges?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.