Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 06:32:51 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 09:24:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 06:36:38, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>Why, what are the for and against? >>I play mainly auto232; and have quite a lot of games. As a result, had I not >>cleared learning, what would this mean. > >What will happen is that your book will dry up and go away. You _must_ lose >a game with nearly every opening at some point in time, and without some >caution, >that will make that line unplayable. And once it is unplayable, >there is no way for it to become playable again, without your intervention. Sounds like a not-so-clever-implementation of book learning to me. ;) Is the traditional way for book-learning a single 'this is a bad position' flag? In this case I can see the problem, but it doesn't seem to be a very clever implementation to me. Or did I miss something else? Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.