Author: Igor Gorelikov
Date: 07:28:29 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 09:58:19, Dan Simmons wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 07:54:15, Igor Gorelikov wrote: > >>Learning is a part of an engine. >> >>Regards, >>Igor Gorelikov > >No, learning is a part of EXPERIENCE. Thus, learning favors the computer >program that has played more games. > >Dan "Thus, learning favors the computer program that has played more games." Even worser, a good book favours the computer program that's got it. Why an improvement made by the programmer (engine update) you consider as a part of the engine while improvement made by the program itself (engine learning - with indirect programmer participation) you consider as an illegal intervention (;-)? Best regards, Igor Gorelikov
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.