Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 09:04:34 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 11:41:00, Brian Katz wrote: >I just ran a 1 PC Engine Tournament (DOUBLE ROUND ROBIN)and Fritz 8 (8.0.0.23) >did not do as well as expected. I have had similar results with the 8.0.0.8 >Engine as well. Fritz 8 scored 7.5 out of 14 possible, while Deep Fritz 7 scored 9 out of 14 possible. This 1.5 point is not a significant difference at all, to say that Fritz 8 didn't do well at the tournament, due to the very little number of games played. If instead you played 140 games and Fritz 8 had 75 points and Deep Fritz 7 had 90, then this difference would mean that Fritz 8 didn't perform well in the tournament, although the %-performance would be the same. >Has anyone had similar results with Fritz 8 while running 1 PC Engine >Tournaments? >I am assuming that Fritz 8 would perform better with a longer time control. >However, a longer time control for this Tournament...(56 Games),would take quite >some time to run, as this one in particular took almost 20 hours. > >Other than Fritz 7, DF7 and Hiarcs 8 which used their own Opening Books, (Hiarcs >8 used the Tournament Book Version) Fritz 8 and all other engines used the Fritz >8 Opening Book. > > GAME 15 (No Increments) Hashtables 64MB (Ponder Off) > AMD Athlon XP 2600+ 1 GIG DDR SDRAM > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >1 Deep Fritz 7 ** ½½ 11 0½ 0½ 1½ ½1 11 9.0/14 56.25 >2 Fritz 7 ½½ ** 0½ 1½ ½½ 11 ½½ 11 9.0/14 55.75 >3 Ruffian 1.0.1 00 1½ ** ½1 10 ½½ 11 ½1 8.5/14 >4 Hiarcs 8 1½ 0½ ½0 ** ½1 11 10 10 8.0/14 >5 Fritz 8 1½ ½½ 01 ½0 ** ½0 1½ ½1 7.5/14 >6 Crafty 19.06 0½ 00 ½½ 00 ½1 ** ½1 ½1 6.0/14 >7 Crafty 19.08 ½0 ½½ 00 01 0½ ½0 ** 1½ 5.0/14 >8 Yace Paderborn 00 00 ½0 01 ½0 ½0 0½ ** 3.0/14 > >Please post your opinions. >Thanks >Brian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.