Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 09:32:45 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 10:27:43, José Carlos wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 08:43:08, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 04:28:28, José Carlos wrote: >> >>>On January 13, 2004 at 18:53:25, Chesster Fritz wrote: >>> >>>>On January 13, 2004 at 16:41:01, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 13, 2004 at 15:52:05, Frank Phillips wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 13, 2004 at 14:54:05, Thomas Mayer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi Rolf, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>:) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>When I would be in SMK's position I would also not talk about that - besides as >>>>>>>a publisher of Shredder I would also not publish something about that >>>>>>>"draw-problem" at WCCC. That is business. >>>>>>>That's like the penalty for Germany at the soccer worldchampionship 1990 - I am >>>>>>>pretty sure that it was no penalty. Or think about the 3:2 at Worldchampionships >>>>>>>1960 in England - usually it's not an englishman who starts the discussion about >>>>>>>that. And the ball was definitely NOT in the goal... :) >>>>>>>Winning counts - how is not so important after a while... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Greets, Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>>3:2 ? >>>>>> >>>>>>1960 ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Well, let's excuse Thommy who wasn't yet born when this happened. He just >>>>>accepts what he has experienced on his own. So all other standards - in special >>>>>fair play coming from England in the 19th century - are old out-dated stuff. >>>>>Just like DschingisKhan... :)) >>>>> >>>>>The rest of the world will always hold in mind the throwing of a game during the >>>>>Wch in Graz to the benefit of SHREDDER. >>>>> >>>>>To all who want to follow Mayer, he was talking of the soccer final in 1966 >>>>>which ended with 4-2 for England. >>>>> >>>>>Rolf >>>> >>>>FYI The rest of the world, with the exception of a few, could care less... >>>> >>>>Fritz >>> >>> You speak in the name of the rest of the world? >>> Funny. >>> >>> José C. >> >>You're misrepresenting what I said. It's simply a fact most of the world isn't >>hung up on such a trivial matter, it has better things to do with it's time. >>I don't have to speak for it nor do I, it just is. >> >>Fritz > > Where did you get that information from? Maybe some survey? What's the degree >of confidence of it? In what countries was it conducted? And what kind of people >was asked? How many people? Or maybe it is some scientific research? > Hint: speak for yourself, not for others. > > José C. Yes, it was a scientific survey, don't be so obtuse, or rude. Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.