Author: José Carlos
Date: 10:30:29 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 12:32:45, Chesster Fritz wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 10:27:43, José Carlos wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 08:43:08, Chesster Fritz wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2004 at 04:28:28, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On January 13, 2004 at 18:53:25, Chesster Fritz wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 13, 2004 at 16:41:01, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 13, 2004 at 15:52:05, Frank Phillips wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 13, 2004 at 14:54:05, Thomas Mayer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hi Rolf, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>:) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>When I would be in SMK's position I would also not talk about that - besides as >>>>>>>>a publisher of Shredder I would also not publish something about that >>>>>>>>"draw-problem" at WCCC. That is business. >>>>>>>>That's like the penalty for Germany at the soccer worldchampionship 1990 - I am >>>>>>>>pretty sure that it was no penalty. Or think about the 3:2 at Worldchampionships >>>>>>>>1960 in England - usually it's not an englishman who starts the discussion about >>>>>>>>that. And the ball was definitely NOT in the goal... :) >>>>>>>>Winning counts - how is not so important after a while... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Greets, Thomas >>>>>>> >>>>>>>3:2 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1960 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Well, let's excuse Thommy who wasn't yet born when this happened. He just >>>>>>accepts what he has experienced on his own. So all other standards - in special >>>>>>fair play coming from England in the 19th century - are old out-dated stuff. >>>>>>Just like DschingisKhan... :)) >>>>>> >>>>>>The rest of the world will always hold in mind the throwing of a game during the >>>>>>Wch in Graz to the benefit of SHREDDER. >>>>>> >>>>>>To all who want to follow Mayer, he was talking of the soccer final in 1966 >>>>>>which ended with 4-2 for England. >>>>>> >>>>>>Rolf >>>>> >>>>>FYI The rest of the world, with the exception of a few, could care less... >>>>> >>>>>Fritz >>>> >>>> You speak in the name of the rest of the world? >>>> Funny. >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>>You're misrepresenting what I said. It's simply a fact most of the world isn't >>>hung up on such a trivial matter, it has better things to do with it's time. >>>I don't have to speak for it nor do I, it just is. >>> >>>Fritz >> >> Where did you get that information from? Maybe some survey? What's the degree >>of confidence of it? In what countries was it conducted? And what kind of people >>was asked? How many people? Or maybe it is some scientific research? >> Hint: speak for yourself, not for others. >> >> José C. > >Yes, it was a scientific survey, Ok, then you can surely answer my questions, can't you? >don't be so obtuse, or rude. No obtuse nor rude words in my questions. Read again. >Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass? That makes your point clear. Thanks. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.