Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:33:28 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 14:53:16, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 12:57:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 11:23:54, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >[...] >>>Of course, but you still should try to learn by avoiding errors. > >>I believe that is what reasonable book learning does... > >To avoid errors, they have to be identified and localized, not always associated >to the last played opening move (only such behavior has been targeted by me). > >The criticized approach on always directly modifying opening books, which only >has been targeted by me, will work the better the worser an implemented opening >book would be, because the probability will increase, that an existing fault is >localized therein. Claiming such a method to be very effective within a chess >program seems not to be a compliment for the used library. > >>You might visit my web site, which now has links to a half-dozen papers I >>have written including the one on book-learning... it explains what I do, >>at least, and how effective it can be. >> >>[www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/hyatt.html] if I recalled that correctly. > >Well, it might be that I am not allowed to see that page (the path is existing), >but it will not be displayed. > >Thank you, Reinhard. www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/hyatt/hyatt.html I left out one "hyatt"...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.