Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:45:17 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 15:00:40, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 14:46:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 14:21:27, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>Kasparov - Anand (Linares 1994) >>>[D]1rb1r1k1/2q1bp2/pp1pp1p1/2n3Pp/Pn2PP1Q/1NN1B2R/1PP3BP/R5K1 w - - 22.Bf3!! Bf8 >>>23.Bxh5!! gxh5 24.Qxh5 Bg7 25.Bd4 e5 26.f5 exd4 27.Qh7+ Kf8 28.f6 Ne6 29.Qh8+ >>>Bxh8 30.Rxh8 mate >> >> >>26. ... exd4 is bad. Kf8 holds on much longer with only a score of >>+1.something. exd4 leads to an instant mate in 4 for white... > >Sorry, i post the variation for humans and not for computers.But you have to >agree that 22.Bg2-f3!! leads to a won position for white. > >So the question is how long will it take Crafty to find 22.Bf3 ? I think that more lines are needed in order to be convinced that white is winning. I do not know if white is winning and I saw no convincing evidence. A win against chess programs can be more convincing. I do not see +1.xx of chess programs after some analysis but only 0.xx Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.