Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 12:59:25 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 15:33:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 14:53:16, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 12:57:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2004 at 11:23:54, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >> >>[...] >>>>Of course, but you still should try to learn by avoiding errors. >> >>>I believe that is what reasonable book learning does... >> >>To avoid errors, they have to be identified and localized, not always associated >>to the last played opening move (only such behavior has been targeted by me). >> >>The criticized approach on always directly modifying opening books, which only >>has been targeted by me, will work the better the worser an implemented opening >>book would be, because the probability will increase, that an existing fault is >>localized therein. Claiming such a method to be very effective within a chess >>program seems not to be a compliment for the used library. >> >>>You might visit my web site, which now has links to a half-dozen papers I >>>have written including the one on book-learning... it explains what I do, >>>at least, and how effective it can be. >>> >>>[www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/hyatt.html] if I recalled that correctly. >> >>Well, it might be that I am not allowed to see that page (the path is existing), >>but it will not be displayed. >> >>Thank you, Reinhard. > > >www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/hyatt/hyatt.html > >I left out one "hyatt"... There is something seriously wrong with the photograph on that webpage. That couldn't be the fire-breathing Hyatt dragon I had been imagining. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.