Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 13:47:41 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 13:40:36, martin fierz wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 12:28:13, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >[snip] > >>They stated he was a rated master of 2250. How can one be more clear than that? >>You people making remarks like "I should thank you it would make more sense and >>it appears funny/strange to you, is simple arrogance. >> >>> >>>http://www.schachbund.de/cgi-bin/dwz/spieler.pl?name=Meyer-Kahlen&vergleich=anfang >> >>And? Either ChessBase erred or he has another rating, simple, yes? > >peter just pointed out, quite correctly, that SMK has a 1900 german rating. he >does *not* have a 2250 rating, and i am pretty certain that chessbase never >wrote that. of course they advertise on their site, but do they lie? i don't >think so. since SMK is german, this 1900 is his official rating, and he has no >other rating that chessbase could have referred to. > >i really don't know what your problem is - peter just corrected your false >statement, and backed up his correction with an official rating, and you call >him arrogant?? > >cheers > martin Maybe I was too curt? Nevertheless, I'm certain I read SMK had a master rating around 2250 in 2002. Maybe ChessBase erred, maybe I did? The important thing is SMK knows something about chess, outside of computer chess. This is what I was explaining to Rolf, but he never listens to anyone, or so it seems. Why everyone has to make a bigger issue out of this then need be, is something I don't understand, as my point is now lost. Regards, Fritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.