Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:04:31 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 16:48:10, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 16:44:31, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 15:57:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2004 at 15:31:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 14, 2004 at 15:00:40, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:46:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:21:27, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Kasparov - Anand (Linares 1994) >>>>>>>[D]1rb1r1k1/2q1bp2/pp1pp1p1/2n3Pp/Pn2PP1Q/1NN1B2R/1PP3BP/R5K1 w - - 22.Bf3!! Bf8 >>>>>>>23.Bxh5!! gxh5 24.Qxh5 Bg7 25.Bd4 e5 26.f5 exd4 27.Qh7+ Kf8 28.f6 Ne6 29.Qh8+ >>>>>>>Bxh8 30.Rxh8 mate >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>26. ... exd4 is bad. Kf8 holds on much longer with only a score of >>>>>>+1.something. exd4 leads to an instant mate in 4 for white... >>>>> >>>>>Sorry, i post the variation for humans and not for computers.But you have to >>>>>agree that 22.Bg2-f3!! leads to a won position for white. >>>>> >>>>>So the question is how long will it take Crafty to find 22.Bf3 ? >>>> >>>>I dont know that it will. However, +1.0 is not a "won position" exactly, >>>>although I would agree that it looks good for white... >>>> >>>>And whether there is something even better is yet another question.. >>> >>>There are really very funny people here in this forum. Come one guys, the white >>>pieces had been moved by the best player of this planet and he had analyzed that >>>game completly in NewInChess magazine 3/94. >> >>I saw a lot of poorly analyzed games from Kasparov (mainly from the pre-computer >>area). >>Show us a convincing forced line after 26...Kf8 (this improvement was already >>suggested in 1994) or shut up. >> >>Michael > >Not in this style. It is not my problem that you or your computer is not able to >find a win for white. You started to insult people in this forum and I gave you the appropriate answer. It never hurts to be critical in chess. Defensive resources are often underestimated. Michael > >TL > >>>[Event "NIC 3/94"] >>>[Site "Linares"] >>>[Date "1994"] >>>[Round "11"] >>>[White "G. Kasparov"] >>>[Black "V. Anand"] >>>[ECO "B57"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. Nge2 Nc6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6 >>>6. Bc4 Qb6 7. Nb3 e6 8. Bf4 Ne5 9. Be2 Be7 10. Be3 Qc7 >>>11. f4 Nc6 12. Bf3 a6 13. O-O O-O 14. a4 b6 15. g4 Rb8 >>>16. g5 Nd7 17. Bg2 Re8 18. Rf3 Nc5 19. Rh3 g6 20. Qg4 Nb4 >>>21. Qh4 h5 22. Bf3 Bf8 23. Bxh5 gxh5 24. Qxh5 Bg7 25. Bd4 >>>e5 26. f5 Nxe4 27. Qh7+ Kf8 28. Nxe4 Bxf5 29. Qxf5 exd4 >>>30. Nf6 Qxc2 31. Nxd4 Qxb2 32. Rd1 Re5 33. Nd7+ Ke7 >>>34. Nxe5 Bxe5 35. Qe4 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.