Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:52:22 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 17:47:02, Paul Doire wrote: >PROOF OF HOW VARIABLE ENGINE PERFORMANCES CAN BE! > >ENJOY....AND OF COURSE I CLAIM NOTHING > >SO FOR WHAT ITS WORTH.......... > > >The last tourney of the three was posted a few days ago. >I wanted to show tourneys together for comparison. >Last 2 played on PIII 450, 256MB RAM, WIN98SE, CHESSBASE GUI >First played on 542 Celeron, 128MB RAM, WIN98SE, CHESSBASE GUI >First 2 Tourneys PONDER OFF >Last PONDER ON > >All Ruffian logs were OK no reduced hash sizes. >Chess Tiger 15 1st tourney NORMAL >Last 2 GAMBIT > >32 MB Ram hash for all > >First two tourneys used 2700ArturoOchoa.ctg >Last used 2700.ctg > >All were 5 minute blitz > > >Best in 5 Cranston 2004 > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >1 The King 3.23 ** 01 1½ ½1 11 01 11 10 0½ 10.5/16 >2 Deep Fritz 8 10 ** 0½ 01 ½1 11 10 01 11 10.0/16 >3 Hiarcs 9 0½ 1½ ** ½1 ½0 01 ½0 11 11 9.5/16 69.25 >4 Chess Tiger 15.0 ½0 10 ½0 ** 0½ 11 01 11 11 9.5/16 65.00 >5 Shredder 7.04 00 ½0 ½1 1½ ** 10 01 ½1 11 9.0/16 >6 Fritz 8 10 00 10 00 01 ** ½1 ½1 10 7.0/16 >7 Deep Junior 8 00 01 ½1 10 10 ½0 ** 00 ½1 6.5/16 51.50 >8 Junior 8 01 10 00 00 ½0 ½0 11 ** 1½ 6.5/16 46.75 >9 Ruffian 2.0.0 1½ 00 00 00 00 01 ½0 0½ ** 3.5/16 > >The best in 2004 > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >1 Deep Junior 8 ** 00 01 01 11 11 11 ½1 11 11.5/16 >2 Fritz 8 11 ** 1½ ½0 ½½ 10 ½1 11 ½1 11.0/16 >3 Shredder 7.04 10 0½ ** ½1 01 1½ 11 11 10 10.5/16 >4 The King 3.23 10 ½1 ½0 ** 01 0½ ½0 ½1 11 8.5/16 >5 Deep Fritz 8 00 ½½ 10 10 ** 10 10 ½1 10 7.5/16 >6 Hiarcs 9 00 01 0½ 1½ 01 ** 01 ½0 01 6.5/16 50.25 >7 Chess Tiger 15.0 00 ½0 00 ½1 01 10 ** 0½ 11 6.5/16 44.00 >8 Ruffian 2.0.0 ½0 00 00 ½0 ½0 ½1 1½ ** 10 5.5/16 >9 Junior 8 00 ½0 01 00 01 10 00 01 ** 4.5/16 > >5 min 2700.ctg trn-1 2004 > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >1 Deep Junior 8 ** 11 ½0 11 10 11 11 11 11 13.5/16 >2 Deep Fritz 8 00 ** ½½ 01 11 1½ 11 11 11 11.5/16 >3 Fritz 8 ½1 ½½ ** 0½ 1½ 01 11 1½ 11 11.0/16 >4 Junior 8 00 10 1½ ** 01 10 11 11 11 10.5/16 60.50 >5 Shredder 7.04 01 00 0½ 10 ** 11 11 11 11 10.5/16 59.50 >6 Hiarcs 9 00 0½ 10 01 00 ** 1½ 11 11 8.0/16 >7 Chess Tiger 15.0 00 00 00 00 00 0½ ** 1½ 11 4.0/16 >8 The King 3.23 00 00 0½ 00 00 00 0½ ** 10 2.0/16 >9 Ruffian 2.0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ** 1.0/16 You have some very strange and unbalanced results. Probably the result of a small number of games. Look at (for instance) your results for "The King". Also, the terrible showing at the bottom of your lists and the very good showing at the top is too skewed. The ELO difference between the top and the bottom program is surely less than 200 Elo. I suspect a setup problem of some kind. Either that, or a lot more games need to be run, and these results were simply an aberration.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.