Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 19:14:45 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 20:56:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 14, 2004 at 16:47:41, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 13:40:36, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2004 at 12:28:13, Chesster Fritz wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>>They stated he was a rated master of 2250. How can one be more clear than that? >>>>You people making remarks like "I should thank you it would make more sense and >>>>it appears funny/strange to you, is simple arrogance. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>http://www.schachbund.de/cgi-bin/dwz/spieler.pl?name=Meyer-Kahlen&vergleich=anfang >>>> >>>>And? Either ChessBase erred or he has another rating, simple, yes? >>> >>>peter just pointed out, quite correctly, that SMK has a 1900 german rating. he >>>does *not* have a 2250 rating, and i am pretty certain that chessbase never >>>wrote that. of course they advertise on their site, but do they lie? i don't >>>think so. since SMK is german, this 1900 is his official rating, and he has no >>>other rating that chessbase could have referred to. >>> >>>i really don't know what your problem is - peter just corrected your false >>>statement, and backed up his correction with an official rating, and you call >>>him arrogant?? >>> >>>cheers >>> martin >> >>Maybe I was too curt? Nevertheless, I'm certain I read SMK had a master rating >>around 2250 in 2002. Maybe ChessBase erred, maybe I did? The important thing is >>SMK knows something about chess, outside of computer chess. This is what I was >>explaining to Rolf, but he never listens to anyone, or so it seems. >> >>Why everyone has to make a bigger issue out of this then need be, is something I >>don't understand, as my point is now lost. > > >No, not your point is lost, but you lost a whole game now. You were dead wrong >with your fantasy of a master title for SMK. You're just braindead. Have you ever played a game of chess? > >It is possible that you confused the rating of SMK with that of his Jonny >opponent Zwanzger who really is a master with probably 2350 or such some. > >I bet my beard that ChessBase NEVER has written that SMK has a master title. >Period. I may be wrong, but I believe I read that at ChessBase in 2002, I could be mistaken, but the point is, SMK *Understands* chess, not just computer chess. SMK really doesn't care what you think, nor do I. > >Rolf > > > >> >>Regards, >> Fritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.