Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 19:49:14 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 22:42:57, Mike Byrne wrote: >source: http://f50.parsimony.net/forum202220/messages/4059.htm > > >Crafty 19.08 SE "fischer" > >Black(1): [d]8/2pp2pp/8/2PP1P2/1p5k/8/PP4p1/6K1 w - - 0 1 >White(1): move >end-game phase > clearing hash tables >crafty is behind 2.0 on time, reducing by 1/6. > time surplus 0.00 time limit 1666:39 (1666:39) >crafty is behind 2.0 on time, reducing by 1/6. > time surplus 0.00 time limit 1666:39 (1666:39) > depth time score variation (1) > 3 0.02 -- 1. a4 > 3 0.02 2.69 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 > 3-> 0.02 2.69 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 > 4 0.02 2.69 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 > 4-> 0.02 2.69 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 > 5 0.02 -- 1. a4 > 5 0.03 1.60 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 4. > a5 > 5-> 0.03 1.60 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 4. > a5 > 6 0.05 1.62 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 4. > d6 cxd6 > 6-> 0.06 1.62 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg4 3. a4 Kxf5 4. > d6 cxd6 > 7 0.06 -- 1. a4 > 7 0.11 -0.42 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg3 3. c6 dxc6 4. > dxc6 Kf3 5. a4 Ke4 6. Kxg2 > 7-> 0.16 -0.42 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg3 3. c6 dxc6 4. > dxc6 Kf3 5. a4 Ke4 6. Kxg2 > 8 0.16 -- 1. a4 > 8 0.25 -3.98 1. a4 bxa3 2. bxa3 Kg3 3. c6 dxc6 4. > d6 cxd6 5. a4 h5 6. a5 h4 7. a6 > 8 0.45 -2.36 1. Kf2 Kg4 2. Kxg2 Kxf5 3. Kf3 Ke5 > 4. Ke3 Kxd5 > 8 0.59 -2.00 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. c6 dxc6 3. dxc6 Kxf5 > 4. Kf3 h5 5. Ke3 g5 > 8-> 0.59 -2.00 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. c6 dxc6 3. dxc6 Kxf5 > 4. Kf3 h5 5. Ke3 g5 (s=4) > 9 0.84 ++ 1. Kxg2!! > 9 1.09 -1.06 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke5 5. a5 Kxd5 6. a6 Kc6 <HT> > (s=3) > 9-> 1.17 -1.06 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke5 5. a5 Kxd5 6. a6 Kc6 <HT> > 10 1.55 ++ 1. Kxg2!! > 10 1.91 0.20 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke5 5. d6 cxd6 6. a5 Kd5 7. a6 > Kc6 8. cxd6 > 10-> 1.99 0.20 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke5 5. d6 cxd6 6. a5 Kd5 7. a6 > Kc6 8. cxd6 > 11 2.81 0.18 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke4 5. d6 cxd6 6. c6 dxc6 7. > a5 h5 8. a6 g5 > 11-> 3.16 0.18 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke4 5. d6 cxd6 6. c6 dxc6 7. > a5 h5 8. a6 g5 > 12 4.55 ++ 1. Kxg2!! > 12 6.05 0.71 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke4 5. d6 cxd6 6. c6 dxc6 7. > a5 h5 8. a6 g5 9. a7 > 12-> 6.42 0.71 1. Kxg2 Kg4 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kxf5 > 4. a4 Ke4 5. d6 cxd6 6. c6 dxc6 7. > a5 h5 8. a6 g5 9. a7 > 13 9.09 ++ 1. Kxg2!! > 13 16.47 1.69 1. Kxg2 Kg5 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kf6 > 4. a4 Ke7 5. a5 Kd8 6. a6 Kc8 7. Kf3 > Kb8 8. Ke4 Ka7 > 13-> 17.27 1.69 1. Kxg2 Kg5 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kf6 > 4. a4 Ke7 5. a5 Kd8 6. a6 Kc8 7. Kf3 > Kb8 8. Ke4 Ka7 > 14 18.53 -- 1. Kxg2 > 14 23.28 1.15 1. Kxg2 Kg5 2. a4 bxa3 3. bxa3 Kf6 > 4. a4 Ke7 5. a5 Kd8 6. Kf3 Kc8 7. Kf4 > Kb7 8. Ke5 h5 > 14 1:01 ++ 1. f6!! > 14-> 1:02 2.08 1. f6 (s=5) > 15 1:07 ++ 1. f6!! > 15 1:18 3.30 1. f6 gxf6 2. Kxg2 Kg5 3. a4 bxa3 4. > bxa3 Kf4 5. a4 Ke5 6. d6 cxd6 7. c6 > dxc6 8. a5 c5 9. a6 c4 10. a7 c3 11. > a8=Q d5 (s=4) > 15-> 1:24 3.30 1. f6 gxf6 2. Kxg2 Kg5 3. a4 bxa3 4. > bxa3 Kf4 5. a4 Ke5 6. d6 cxd6 7. c6 > dxc6 8. a5 c5 9. a6 c4 10. a7 c3 11. > a8=Q d5 > 16 1:31 2.95 1. f6 gxf6 2. Kxg2 Kg5 3. a4 bxa3 4. > bxa3 Kf4 5. a4 Ke4 6. d6 cxd6 7. c6 > dxc6 8. a5 f5 9. a6 Ke3 10. a7 f4 <HT> > 16-> 1:51 2.95 1. f6 gxf6 2. Kxg2 Kg5 3. a4 bxa3 4. > bxa3 Kf4 5. a4 Ke4 6. d6 cxd6 7. c6 > dxc6 8. a5 f5 9. a6 Ke3 10. a7 f4 <HT> > (s=4) > 17 2:06 ++ 1. f6!! >? 17 2:15 1/9* 1. f6 >White(1): ? > time=2:28 cpu=195% mat=-1 n=167321426 fh=93% nps=1.13M > ext-> chk=13983671 cap=493603 pp=10304421 1rep=526374 mate=15058 > predicted=1 nodes=167321426 evals=65290030 > endgame tablebase-> probes=15 hits=15 > SMP-> split=4723 stop=386 data=9/64 cpu=4:50 elap=2:28 > >White(1): f6 > time used: 2:28 Not a bad result! This position isn't easy for computers. Did you enter the contest? Problem number 4 was clever.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.