Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is DeepSjeng strong enough to find a move by Kasparov in Linares?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:52:31 01/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2004 at 15:57:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:

>On January 14, 2004 at 15:31:27, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 14, 2004 at 15:00:40, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>
>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:46:39, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 14, 2004 at 14:21:27, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Kasparov - Anand (Linares 1994)
>>>>>[D]1rb1r1k1/2q1bp2/pp1pp1p1/2n3Pp/Pn2PP1Q/1NN1B2R/1PP3BP/R5K1 w - - 22.Bf3!! Bf8
>>>>>23.Bxh5!! gxh5 24.Qxh5 Bg7 25.Bd4 e5 26.f5 exd4 27.Qh7+ Kf8 28.f6 Ne6 29.Qh8+
>>>>>Bxh8 30.Rxh8 mate
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>26. ... exd4 is bad.  Kf8 holds on much longer with only a score of
>>>>+1.something. exd4 leads to an instant mate in 4 for white...
>>>
>>>Sorry, i post the variation for humans and not for computers.But you have to
>>>agree that 22.Bg2-f3!! leads to a won position for white.
>>>
>>>So the question is how long will it take Crafty to find 22.Bf3 ?
>>
>>I dont know that it will.  However, +1.0 is not a "won position" exactly,
>>although I would agree that it looks good for white...
>>
>>And whether there is something even better is yet another question..
>
>There are really very funny people here in this forum. Come one guys, the white
>pieces had been moved by the best player of this planet and he had analyzed that
>game completly in NewInChess magazine 3/94.

You need to first (a) turn down the rudeness;  then (b) turn up the thought
process louder.

What _I_ responded to was _not_ Kasparov's analysis.  It was about the move
played in the game, that was an instant loss.  26. ... Kf8 does _not_ get
mated in the next 10-15 moves, while the game move got mated in 4 moves.

Second, do you think Kasparov never makes mistakes?  Did he not blunder in a
won and then in a drawing position against deep junior?  Did he not resign in
a drawn position against DB?  meat makes mistakes, whether it is Kasparov's
meat or mine.

Back to the game.  I responded to your suggested Bx move.  It is _not_
crushing yet...

I would rather be white, but I would much rather be black after 26. ... Kf8
than black after the move played in the game.

BTW I _did_ give this some thought.  I suspect you just blindly accept
any analysis by Kasparov as "absolute truth" with no thought whatsoever..

I didn't see anything "funny" at all, myself...

But perhaps I won't respond next time you pose a question either?

This thread _was_ started by a question about the plan starting with Bf3.

>
>[Event "NIC 3/94"]
>[Site "Linares"]
>[Date "1994"]
>[Round "11"]
>[White "G. Kasparov"]
>[Black "V. Anand"]
>[ECO "B57"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. Nge2 Nc6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6
>6. Bc4 Qb6 7. Nb3 e6 8. Bf4 Ne5 9. Be2 Be7 10. Be3 Qc7
>11. f4 Nc6 12. Bf3 a6 13. O-O O-O 14. a4 b6 15. g4 Rb8
>16. g5 Nd7 17. Bg2 Re8 18. Rf3 Nc5 19. Rh3 g6 20. Qg4 Nb4
>21. Qh4 h5 22. Bf3 Bf8 23. Bxh5 gxh5 24. Qxh5 Bg7 25. Bd4
>e5 26. f5 Nxe4 27. Qh7+ Kf8 28. Nxe4 Bxf5 29. Qxf5 exd4
>30. Nf6 Qxc2 31. Nxd4 Qxb2 32. Rd1 Re5 33. Nd7+ Ke7
>34. Nxe5 Bxe5 35. Qe4 1-0



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.