Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Stefan Mayer-Kahlen comments on his victory...

Author: José Carlos

Date: 23:55:45 01/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


>>>Why can't we stay on topic rather than exchanging insults?
>>
>>
>>It was you who had insulted JC not he you.
>
>Too bad you can't read English.




  I can't read english either, then. Nor write it, it seems. Please, quote my
insult. This was yours:

>>>>>don't be so obtuse, or rude.
>>>>>Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass?




>>> Ok, maybe the issue
>>>about Graz isn't trivial to you or several others who post at this forum, but
>>>outside this forum, people for the most part don't care or don't care that much.
>>
>>
>>Because they dont understand the arguments.
>
>No kidding, niether can you, I might as well discuss this with my pets.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Even the ones who do care have moved on, but some haven't, like Rolf.
>>
>>
>>
>>Please get real. I have no money or energy in that topic other than decent
>>science. I was already well "over it" when I read how confusing SMK reported
>>about his "success". There must be a minimum of decency.
>
>Oh, I'm quite real...but you? You're a study in abnormal psychology.



  Another insult. Quite a poor argument to defend a position.



>>>
>>>I've read my fill on what happened at Graz, and although what happened was
>>>unfortunate, it wasn't the end of honest computer chess championships.
>>
>>
>>Of course it wasn't but the event in Graz ended with a wrong result. Simply
>>because the decisions were totally wrong. It is then dishonest to behave as if
>>nothing spectacular had happened... You see, that is the point, not that I had
>>reported about that ChessBase PR.
>>
>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


  This argument is also poor, but at least no insult.



>>>
>>>Sometimes you have to let it go. Learn by it and move on. This is one of those
>>>times.
>>
>>
>>What is the base of what you are saying here? Bob Hyatt explained why simply the
>>result is unacceptable and wrong. Why should suddenly be right what is wrong
>>down to the bones? Only because you want it?
>>
>>
>No, I just live in the REAL world.


  The real world is unfair. Some criminals never get caught and some people go
to jail by mistake. Sometimes the referees make mistakes and change the results
of a competition. It happens in football, in chess, in tenis... But freedom of
speech allows us to discuss here and to say outloud that the referee in Graz
made a terrible mistake and changed the result. It happens all the time in the
"real world", but that doesn't mean we must shut up about it.



>>>The topic, if you read the whole column, is Rolf's critisism of SMK in a
>>>ChessBase ad, for not mentioning how SMK won WCCC, by a supposed bad call
>>>after a 3rd repeat. Also that SMK knows nothing about chess, which is most
>>>certainly incorrect.
>>
>>You make a wrong description of what I wrote.
>
>Did I? I doubt you comprehend your own ramblings.


  Please, stop this or someone will complain to moderators. Your violating the
charter with your insults.



>>
>>
>>>
>>>Then he goes on that SMK's  only interests are business...duh!;Of course the ad
>>>is business, and saying anything else would be idiotic.
>>
>>
>>No, this is wrong. He can have all the interests he wants but he cant claim - on
>>the base of his chess understanding as he wrote - that it was normal that Fritz
>>and Shredder came into the tie. This is completely false. He came into the tie
>>due to a participant throwing a whoke game which is very evil!
>>
>>Rolf
>>
>Uh-huh, you're very sick, get help.


  The final conclusion of your arguments. Very telling.



  José C.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.