Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 01:41:13 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 04:33:57, Christian Koch wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 04:19:40, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 02:35:32, Christian Koch wrote: >> >>>Hi @all, >>> >>>I played the first 12 games with Ruffian 2.0.0 vs. Shredder 8 >>> >>>Conditions: >>> >>>- AMD XP 2000+ / 1GB RAM >>>- ponder=off >>>- hashtables = 256 MB for both engines >>>- GUI = Arena 1.0.2 >>>- book = no own books >>>- pgn random from Olivier DEVILLE >>>- time = 40 moves in 15 minutes >>>- all 4 piece tablebases from Nalimov >>> >>>Shredder 8 - Ruffian 2.0.0 = 9.5 - 2.5 (+9 =1 -2) >>> >>>Elo difference 174 points (EloStat) >>> >>>If someone is interested in the games, send an email to Christian.Koch@Hanse.Net >>> >>>best regards, >>>Christian >> >>For me it is not imporatant this results. >> >>Shredder is blitz WCh 2003 and the timecontrol is in my eyes like a Blitz >>timecontrol (when you play 40 moves in only 15 minutes). >> >>Eduard > >Eduard come on, start your engines and play Shredder 8 vs. Ruffian 2.0.0 with 40 >moves in 120 minutes and post the result. a) Shredder 8 I have not. b) Your timecontrol is like 22,5s/move. This is for me not interesting. When I play 30' game, then I see that Programs thinking 1-3moves about 2-4 minutes, and in last time (last 5') does blitz. German: bei deiner Zeitkontrolle sind die Programme jedoch praktisch gezwungen sehr schnell zu ziehen. Und das ist Shrdder bekanntlich besser. Eduard Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.