Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 03:57:01 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 06:35:06, Jouni Uski wrote: >Hi Djordje! > >I made some time ago comparison between Leiden and 2.0.0 Ruffian. In some 200 >test positions differences in evaluation and solving time were very minimal - >actually may be >in 5 positions significant! How can there be any real difference in playing >strength? > >Jouni Hi Jouni, test positions could and may not necessarily mean too much in actual game play (just think about Little Goliath etc.). Ruffian Leiden is more in the old Ruffian 1.0.1 and 1.0.5 groove (solid, counter attacker) while Ruffian 2.0 is a more aggressive, and more unstable, version. I would always pick Ruffian Leiden as the best Ruffian there is and I would not be too sure that there is a program in the world that can beat it for sure and with a convincing margin. At least that is what my test results show. However, I am involved and a little biased here. Regards, Djordje Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.