Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 05:34:12 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 02:55:45, José Carlos wrote: >>>>Why can't we stay on topic rather than exchanging insults? >>> >>> >>>It was you who had insulted JC not he you. >> >>Too bad you can't read English. > > > > > I can't read english either, then. Nor write it, it seems. Please, quote my >insult. This was yours: I need not to, it was your attitude that was rude. > >>>>>>don't be so obtuse, or rude. >>>>>>Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass? > > > > >>>> Ok, maybe the issue >>>>about Graz isn't trivial to you or several others who post at this forum, but >>>>outside this forum, people for the most part don't care or don't care that much. >>> >>> >>>Because they dont understand the arguments. >> >>No kidding, niether can you, I might as well discuss this with my pets. >>> >>> >>> >>>>Even the ones who do care have moved on, but some haven't, like Rolf. >>> >>> >>> >>>Please get real. I have no money or energy in that topic other than decent >>>science. I was already well "over it" when I read how confusing SMK reported >>>about his "success". There must be a minimum of decency. >> >>Oh, I'm quite real...but you? You're a study in abnormal psychology. > > > > Another insult. Quite a poor argument to defend a position. It is an insult, it was meant as an insult, as Rolf is a condescending know-it-all jerk. BTW I actually do mean what I say here, Rolf has mental health issues. This last piece is not meant to be an insult, just obvious observable behaviour. > > > >>>> >>>>I've read my fill on what happened at Graz, and although what happened was >>>>unfortunate, it wasn't the end of honest computer chess championships. >>> >>> >>>Of course it wasn't but the event in Graz ended with a wrong result. Simply >>>because the decisions were totally wrong. It is then dishonest to behave as if >>>nothing spectacular had happened... You see, that is the point, not that I had >>>reported about that ChessBase PR. >>> >>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ > > > This argument is also poor, but at least no insult. Why would I continue to discuss this with Rolf when I know it is pointless? > > >>>> >>>>Sometimes you have to let it go. Learn by it and move on. This is one of those >>>>times. >>> >>> >>>What is the base of what you are saying here? Bob Hyatt explained why simply the >>>result is unacceptable and wrong. Why should suddenly be right what is wrong >>>down to the bones? Only because you want it? >>> >>> >>No, I just live in the REAL world. > > > The real world is unfair. Some criminals never get caught and some people go >to jail by mistake. Sometimes the referees make mistakes and change the results >of a competition. It happens in football, in chess, in tenis... But freedom of >speech allows us to discuss here and to say outloud that the referee in Graz >made a terrible mistake and changed the result. It happens all the time in the >"real world", but that doesn't mean we must shut up about it. Yes, and I concur with what you're saying, but this has little to do with advertising;-) > > > >>>>The topic, if you read the whole column, is Rolf's critisism of SMK in a >>>>ChessBase ad, for not mentioning how SMK won WCCC, by a supposed bad call >>>>after a 3rd repeat. Also that SMK knows nothing about chess, which is most >>>>certainly incorrect. >>> >>>You make a wrong description of what I wrote. >> >>Did I? I doubt you comprehend your own ramblings. > > > Please, stop this or someone will complain to moderators. Your violating the >charter with your insults. > Complain if you want, it's your right. > > >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Then he goes on that SMK's only interests are business...duh!;Of course the ad >>>>is business, and saying anything else would be idiotic. >>> >>> >>>No, this is wrong. He can have all the interests he wants but he cant claim - on >>>the base of his chess understanding as he wrote - that it was normal that Fritz >>>and Shredder came into the tie. This is completely false. He came into the tie >>>due to a participant throwing a whoke game which is very evil! >>> >>>Rolf >>> >>Uh-huh, you're very sick, get help. > > > The final conclusion of your arguments. Very telling. It is isn't it? I also know I'm right, Rolf has serious issues, and needs to address them. > > > > José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.