Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 08:00:12 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 08:14:48, Volker Pittlik wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 06:22:24, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>People simply forget that the Ruffian CD has another, well-tested version of >>Ruffian (Ruffian Leiden) that was in the works for about one year; thoroughly >>tested both by the author (Per-Ola Valfridsson) and myself. Ruffian 2.0 is a >>tactically stronger but rather unbalanced version of the program, actually still >>in Beta stage as far as I am concerned... Anyway, here is my score at blitz >>between the two, played last night on a P4-2.6 Ghz (hash 64MB for both): > >Hello Djordje, > >I'm just starting a tourney with strong amateurs and commercial engines. What >version of Rufffian would you suggest to participate? > >Ruffian_200 with the book from the same folder? >Ruffian_Leiden with the book from the same folder? >Both with the same book (which one)? > >Slightly bemused > >Regards, Volker Hi Volker, I'd suggest to use Ruffian Leiden with the Leiden book (I believe that's book #2). Of course, there may be dissenting opinions, but that would be my suggestion. If you decide on Ruffian 2.0, then do use the Leiden book as well. Since you are bemused, I can see that you got my point :-) Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.