Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: That´s great

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 08:30:08 01/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:

>
>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good
>news.
>
>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess.
>
>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov?

Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here
type of "war"?

In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match,
where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position.  My program
won't resign there.  Does that make it better than Kasparov?  That kind
of logic is simply flawed.

Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of
blunders to go along with the brilliancies.  I don't think that just because
a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better.
Single moves don't mean a lot.  Complete games do.



>
>Greetings
>
>Thomas Lagershausen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.