Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 11:57:01 01/15/04
On January 15, 2004 at 11:30:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >> >>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good >>news. >> >>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess. >> >>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov? > >Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here >type of "war"? Noooo!!!!! pleeeeease no war !!! > >In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match, >where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position. My program >won't resign there. Does that make it better than Kasparov? That kind >of logic is simply flawed. Sorry, but i don´t like this kind of simple logic. > >Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of >blunders to go along with the brilliancies. I don't think that just because >a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better. >Single moves don't mean a lot. Complete games do. Yes!!!, and as we know he is the highest rated player in the world, which means that a has the most wins against the best players of the world. Do you believe that your program can do it as well as Kasparov it did?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.