Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:29:48 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 08:15:14, Chesster Fritz wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 05:59:34, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On January 14, 2004 at 22:14:45, Chesster Fritz wrote: >> >>>I may be wrong, but I believe I read that at ChessBase in 2002, I could be >>>mistaken, but the point is, SMK *Understands* chess, not just computer chess. >>> >>>SMK really doesn't care what you think, nor do I. >> >> >>You are right. "may be wrong", "believe", "could be mistaken" - now that in sum >>makes you right again. :) >> >>All the best to you, >> >>Rolf > > >I do *know* that SMK plays good chess and isn't impotent, the word you used to >describe SMK's abilities. > >Need I say more? Sure. You should at first read his article in ChessBase then mine and then you should try to understand what I meant with my critic. The one has something to do with the other. Your trick now is to discuss the topic independently from the events in Graz. Exactly what he did too. But then my critic is ok. Both against SMK and you too. You know a man of his strength and then how he writes. But you must be able to read in German. Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.