Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:36:18 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 08:34:12, Chesster Fritz wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 02:55:45, José Carlos wrote: > >>>>>Why can't we stay on topic rather than exchanging insults? >>>> >>>> >>>>It was you who had insulted JC not he you. >>> >>>Too bad you can't read English. >> >> >> >> >> I can't read english either, then. Nor write it, it seems. Please, quote my >>insult. This was yours: > >I need not to, it was your attitude that was rude. But you cannot prove that in his messages? Funny. >> >>>>>>>don't be so obtuse, or rude. >>>>>>>Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass? Was that your insult or not? And you think that this is allowed here? >> >> >> >> >>>>> Ok, maybe the issue >>>>>about Graz isn't trivial to you or several others who post at this forum, but >>>>>outside this forum, people for the most part don't care or don't care that much. >>>> >>>> >>>>Because they dont understand the arguments. >>> >>>No kidding, niether can you, I might as well discuss this with my pets. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Even the ones who do care have moved on, but some haven't, like Rolf. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Please get real. I have no money or energy in that topic other than decent >>>>science. I was already well "over it" when I read how confusing SMK reported >>>>about his "success". There must be a minimum of decency. >>> >>>Oh, I'm quite real...but you? You're a study in abnormal psychology. >> >> >> >> Another insult. Quite a poor argument to defend a position. > >It is an insult, it was meant as an insult, as Rolf is a condescending >know-it-all jerk. BTW I actually do mean what I say here, Rolf has mental health >issues. >This last piece is not meant to be an insult, just obvious observable behaviour. Could you specify what your field is. I assume that you have a long university life behind you and you have the examinations already passed? > >> >> >> >>>>> >>>>>I've read my fill on what happened at Graz, and although what happened was >>>>>unfortunate, it wasn't the end of honest computer chess championships. >>>> >>>> >>>>Of course it wasn't but the event in Graz ended with a wrong result. Simply >>>>because the decisions were totally wrong. It is then dishonest to behave as if >>>>nothing spectacular had happened... You see, that is the point, not that I had >>>>reported about that ChessBase PR. >>>> >>>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ >> >> >> This argument is also poor, but at least no insult. > >Why would I continue to discuss this with Rolf when I know it is pointless? >> >> >>>>> >>>>>Sometimes you have to let it go. Learn by it and move on. This is one of those >>>>>times. >>>> >>>> >>>>What is the base of what you are saying here? Bob Hyatt explained why simply the >>>>result is unacceptable and wrong. Why should suddenly be right what is wrong >>>>down to the bones? Only because you want it? >>>> >>>> >>>No, I just live in the REAL world. >> >> >> The real world is unfair. Some criminals never get caught and some people go >>to jail by mistake. Sometimes the referees make mistakes and change the results >>of a competition. It happens in football, in chess, in tenis... But freedom of >>speech allows us to discuss here and to say outloud that the referee in Graz >>made a terrible mistake and changed the result. It happens all the time in the >>"real world", but that doesn't mean we must shut up about it. > >Yes, and I concur with what you're saying, but this has little to do with >advertising;-) >> >> >> >>>>>The topic, if you read the whole column, is Rolf's critisism of SMK in a >>>>>ChessBase ad, for not mentioning how SMK won WCCC, by a supposed bad call >>>>>after a 3rd repeat. Also that SMK knows nothing about chess, which is most >>>>>certainly incorrect. >>>> >>>>You make a wrong description of what I wrote. >>> >>>Did I? I doubt you comprehend your own ramblings. >> >> >> Please, stop this or someone will complain to moderators. Your violating the >>charter with your insults. >> >Complain if you want, it's your right. Are you a real life man or just a fantasy pseudo? Because then I understand your behaviour. You can write what you want and come back with a new pseudo. >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Then he goes on that SMK's only interests are business...duh!;Of course the ad >>>>>is business, and saying anything else would be idiotic. >>>> >>>> >>>>No, this is wrong. He can have all the interests he wants but he cant claim - on >>>>the base of his chess understanding as he wrote - that it was normal that Fritz >>>>and Shredder came into the tie. This is completely false. He came into the tie >>>>due to a participant throwing a whoke game which is very evil! >>>> >>>>Rolf >>>> >>>Uh-huh, you're very sick, get help. >> >> >> The final conclusion of your arguments. Very telling. > >It is isn't it? I also know I'm right, Rolf has serious issues, and needs to >address them. Sure, I know how to address people like you. Rolf >> >> >> >> José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.