Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 19:57:40 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 22:27:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 22:23:01, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 20:38:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2004 at 17:11:08, John Paul Jones wrote: >>> >>>>On January 15, 2004 at 14:57:01, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 11:30:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good >>>>>>>news. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov? >>>>>> >>>>>>Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here >>>>>>type of "war"? >>>>> >>>>>Noooo!!!!! pleeeeease no war !!! >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match, >>>>>>where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position. My program >>>>>>won't resign there. Does that make it better than Kasparov? That kind >>>>>>of logic is simply flawed. >>>>> >>>>>Sorry, but i don´t like this kind of simple logic. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of >>>>>>blunders to go along with the brilliancies. I don't think that just because >>>>>>a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better. >>>>>>Single moves don't mean a lot. Complete games do. >>>>> >>>>>Yes!!!, and as we know he is the highest rated player in the world, which means >>>>>that a has the most wins against the best players of the world. Do you believe >>>>>that your program can do it as well as Kasparov it did? >>>> >>>> >>>>Crafty would not stand a prayer in anything longer then game in 15 >>> >>> >>>I would not be surprised if it _won_ at anything under game/30. And at >>>longer time controls it is _not_ easy to beat it there... There's plenty >>>of evidence. It has played GMs at long time controls more than once... >> >>Perhaps, Bob H., you should offer Kasparov a handicap. Let him have several >>times as much time per move on average, but play blitz. >> >>I don't know how to pay the guy. Maybe trick him into playing for free. I >>don't know what else. Say to Kasparov: "My chess program can give you odds and >>still whip you at blitz." Maybe he would respond to that challenge just for the >>fun of it? >> >>: ) >> >>Bob D. > >I've done that with Cray Blitz in the past. I used to type moves in, play >5 minute vs 5 minute chess, and hardly ever lost a game. Even with the >input/output time. I had CB use 3 secs/move until it had used 1 minute, then >2 secs/move until it had used 2 minutes total (counting first minute) then down >to 1 sec per move. It maybe lost one game out of 20 against GM players... > >I really don't care who believe who can beat who. It is way too easy to >determine that on ICC for example. Only by inference, I assume. I don't think Kasparov plays at ICC, but don't actually know for sure. Maybe he prefers European servers or is afraid to reveal his opening preparation. Whatever. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.