Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:06:51 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 22:57:40, Bob Durrett wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 22:27:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 22:23:01, Bob Durrett wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2004 at 20:38:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 15, 2004 at 17:11:08, John Paul Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 14:57:01, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 11:30:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good >>>>>>>>news. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here >>>>>>>type of "war"? >>>>>> >>>>>>Noooo!!!!! pleeeeease no war !!! >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match, >>>>>>>where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position. My program >>>>>>>won't resign there. Does that make it better than Kasparov? That kind >>>>>>>of logic is simply flawed. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sorry, but i don´t like this kind of simple logic. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of >>>>>>>blunders to go along with the brilliancies. I don't think that just because >>>>>>>a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better. >>>>>>>Single moves don't mean a lot. Complete games do. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes!!!, and as we know he is the highest rated player in the world, which means >>>>>>that a has the most wins against the best players of the world. Do you believe >>>>>>that your program can do it as well as Kasparov it did? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Crafty would not stand a prayer in anything longer then game in 15 >>>> >>>> >>>>I would not be surprised if it _won_ at anything under game/30. And at >>>>longer time controls it is _not_ easy to beat it there... There's plenty >>>>of evidence. It has played GMs at long time controls more than once... >>> >>>Perhaps, Bob H., you should offer Kasparov a handicap. Let him have several >>>times as much time per move on average, but play blitz. >>> >>>I don't know how to pay the guy. Maybe trick him into playing for free. I >>>don't know what else. Say to Kasparov: "My chess program can give you odds and >>>still whip you at blitz." Maybe he would respond to that challenge just for the >>>fun of it? >>> >>>: ) >>> >>>Bob D. >> >>I've done that with Cray Blitz in the past. I used to type moves in, play >>5 minute vs 5 minute chess, and hardly ever lost a game. Even with the >>input/output time. I had CB use 3 secs/move until it had used 1 minute, then >>2 secs/move until it had used 2 minutes total (counting first minute) then down >>to 1 sec per move. It maybe lost one game out of 20 against GM players... >> >>I really don't care who believe who can beat who. It is way too easy to >>determine that on ICC for example. > >Only by inference, I assume. I don't think Kasparov plays at ICC, but don't >actually know for sure. Maybe he prefers European servers or is afraid to >reveal his opening preparation. > >Whatever. > >Bob D. I'm talking about strong GMs in general. IE I'm not certain Kasparov is the best "blitz player" there is, for example...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.