Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 20:31:02 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 18:36:18, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 08:34:12, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 02:55:45, José Carlos wrote: >> >>>>>>Why can't we stay on topic rather than exchanging insults? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It was you who had insulted JC not he you. >>>> >>>>Too bad you can't read English. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't read english either, then. Nor write it, it seems. Please, quote my >>>insult. This was yours: >> >>I need not to, it was your attitude that was rude. > > >But you cannot prove that in his messages? Funny. > > > >>> >>>>>>>>don't be so obtuse, or rude. >>>>>>>>Unless you like coming off looking like a pompous ass? > >Was that your insult or not? And you think that this is allowed here? > > > > > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Ok, maybe the issue >>>>>>about Graz isn't trivial to you or several others who post at this forum, but >>>>>>outside this forum, people for the most part don't care or don't care that much. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Because they dont understand the arguments. >>>> >>>>No kidding, niether can you, I might as well discuss this with my pets. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Even the ones who do care have moved on, but some haven't, like Rolf. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Please get real. I have no money or energy in that topic other than decent >>>>>science. I was already well "over it" when I read how confusing SMK reported >>>>>about his "success". There must be a minimum of decency. >>>> >>>>Oh, I'm quite real...but you? You're a study in abnormal psychology. >>> >>> >>> >>> Another insult. Quite a poor argument to defend a position. >> >>It is an insult, it was meant as an insult, as Rolf is a condescending >>know-it-all jerk. BTW I actually do mean what I say here, Rolf has mental health >>issues. >>This last piece is not meant to be an insult, just obvious observable behaviour. > > >Could you specify what your field is. I assume that you have a long university >life behind you and you have the examinations already passed? > > > >> >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I've read my fill on what happened at Graz, and although what happened was >>>>>>unfortunate, it wasn't the end of honest computer chess championships. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Of course it wasn't but the event in Graz ended with a wrong result. Simply >>>>>because the decisions were totally wrong. It is then dishonest to behave as if >>>>>nothing spectacular had happened... You see, that is the point, not that I had >>>>>reported about that ChessBase PR. >>>>> >>>>ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ >>> >>> >>> This argument is also poor, but at least no insult. >> >>Why would I continue to discuss this with Rolf when I know it is pointless? >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Sometimes you have to let it go. Learn by it and move on. This is one of those >>>>>>times. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>What is the base of what you are saying here? Bob Hyatt explained why simply the >>>>>result is unacceptable and wrong. Why should suddenly be right what is wrong >>>>>down to the bones? Only because you want it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>No, I just live in the REAL world. >>> >>> >>> The real world is unfair. Some criminals never get caught and some people go >>>to jail by mistake. Sometimes the referees make mistakes and change the results >>>of a competition. It happens in football, in chess, in tenis... But freedom of >>>speech allows us to discuss here and to say outloud that the referee in Graz >>>made a terrible mistake and changed the result. It happens all the time in the >>>"real world", but that doesn't mean we must shut up about it. >> >>Yes, and I concur with what you're saying, but this has little to do with >>advertising;-) >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>The topic, if you read the whole column, is Rolf's critisism of SMK in a >>>>>>ChessBase ad, for not mentioning how SMK won WCCC, by a supposed bad call >>>>>>after a 3rd repeat. Also that SMK knows nothing about chess, which is most >>>>>>certainly incorrect. >>>>> >>>>>You make a wrong description of what I wrote. >>>> >>>>Did I? I doubt you comprehend your own ramblings. >>> >>> >>> Please, stop this or someone will complain to moderators. Your violating the >>>charter with your insults. >>> >>Complain if you want, it's your right. > >Are you a real life man or just a fantasy pseudo? Because then I understand your >behaviour. You can write what you want and come back with a new pseudo. > > >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Then he goes on that SMK's only interests are business...duh!;Of course the ad >>>>>>is business, and saying anything else would be idiotic. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No, this is wrong. He can have all the interests he wants but he cant claim - on >>>>>the base of his chess understanding as he wrote - that it was normal that Fritz >>>>>and Shredder came into the tie. This is completely false. He came into the tie >>>>>due to a participant throwing a whoke game which is very evil! >>>>> >>>>>Rolf >>>>> >>>>Uh-huh, you're very sick, get help. >>> >>> >>> The final conclusion of your arguments. Very telling. >> >>It is isn't it? I also know I'm right, Rolf has serious issues, and needs to >>address them. > > >Sure, I know how to address people like you. I'm sure you do.... > >Rolf > > > >>> >>> >>> >>> José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.