Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:58:28 01/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2004 at 09:53:58, Bob Durrett wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 23:06:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 22:57:40, Bob Durrett wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2004 at 22:27:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 15, 2004 at 22:23:01, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 20:38:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 17:11:08, John Paul Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 14:57:01, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 11:30:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good >>>>>>>>>>news. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here >>>>>>>>>type of "war"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Noooo!!!!! pleeeeease no war !!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match, >>>>>>>>>where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position. My program >>>>>>>>>won't resign there. Does that make it better than Kasparov? That kind >>>>>>>>>of logic is simply flawed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Sorry, but i don´t like this kind of simple logic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of >>>>>>>>>blunders to go along with the brilliancies. I don't think that just because >>>>>>>>>a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better. >>>>>>>>>Single moves don't mean a lot. Complete games do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yes!!!, and as we know he is the highest rated player in the world, which means >>>>>>>>that a has the most wins against the best players of the world. Do you believe >>>>>>>>that your program can do it as well as Kasparov it did? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Crafty would not stand a prayer in anything longer then game in 15 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I would not be surprised if it _won_ at anything under game/30. And at >>>>>>longer time controls it is _not_ easy to beat it there... There's plenty >>>>>>of evidence. It has played GMs at long time controls more than once... >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps, Bob H., you should offer Kasparov a handicap. Let him have several >>>>>times as much time per move on average, but play blitz. >>>>> >>>>>I don't know how to pay the guy. Maybe trick him into playing for free. I >>>>>don't know what else. Say to Kasparov: "My chess program can give you odds and >>>>>still whip you at blitz." Maybe he would respond to that challenge just for the >>>>>fun of it? >>>>> >>>>>: ) >>>>> >>>>>Bob D. >>>> >>>>I've done that with Cray Blitz in the past. I used to type moves in, play >>>>5 minute vs 5 minute chess, and hardly ever lost a game. Even with the >>>>input/output time. I had CB use 3 secs/move until it had used 1 minute, then >>>>2 secs/move until it had used 2 minutes total (counting first minute) then down >>>>to 1 sec per move. It maybe lost one game out of 20 against GM players... >>>> >>>>I really don't care who believe who can beat who. It is way too easy to >>>>determine that on ICC for example. >>> >>>Only by inference, I assume. I don't think Kasparov plays at ICC, but don't >>>actually know for sure. Maybe he prefers European servers or is afraid to >>>reveal his opening preparation. >>> >>>Whatever. >>> >>>Bob D. >> >> >>I'm talking about strong GMs in general. IE I'm not certain Kasparov is the >>best "blitz player" there is, for example... > >Chess Server equals "Blitz" : - ) [Actually, very True.] (n.t.) > >Bob D. I'm thinking "blitz" --> 5 minute chess, no increment, whether played on a server on OTB...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.