Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:25:01 01/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2004 at 17:02:19, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 17, 2004 at 16:55:35, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>I think, such high depth without real convincing score is a sign for draw. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter > >I am not sure >When the score goes up it is a sign for a win. > >Here is depth 32(not finished) >Yace failed high again. > >New game >8/8/5pk1/5b2/7K/3R3p/7P/8 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Yace Paderborn: > >1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 3.Re1 Bf5 4.Rf1 Kg6 5.Rg1+ Kf7 6.Kh5 Be6 > +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:01:57 1839652kN > >(Blass, Tel-Aviv 18.01.2004) I see it all the time. In fact, if I see a small but yet persistent gain for new plies, it is usually because of a positional superiority that will eventually tell. If you get a fail high (even though a fairly small one) that is even more telling. I have found that I sometimes get superior answers by letting the program think for one hour per move on autoplay. Yace is very good for this. Usually, by the time the analysis becomes very deep, the root move is going to stay the same. Or if it does change, it will take a stupendously long time to resolve it. By actually choosing the move, it can often become much easier to resolve events that are fairly far in the future.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.