Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:52:56 01/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2004 at 17:25:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 17, 2004 at 17:02:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 17, 2004 at 16:55:35, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >> >>>I think, such high depth without real convincing score is a sign for draw. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Dieter >> >>I am not sure >>When the score goes up it is a sign for a win. >> >>Here is depth 32(not finished) >>Yace failed high again. >> >>New game >>8/8/5pk1/5b2/7K/3R3p/7P/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Yace Paderborn: >> >>1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 3.Re1 Bf5 4.Rf1 Kg6 5.Rg1+ Kf7 6.Kh5 Be6 >> +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:01:57 1839652kN >> >>(Blass, Tel-Aviv 18.01.2004) > >I see it all the time. > >In fact, if I see a small but yet persistent gain for new plies, it is usually >because of a positional superiority that will eventually tell. If you get a >fail high (even though a fairly small one) that is even more telling. > >I have found that I sometimes get superior answers by letting the program think >for one hour per move on autoplay. Yace is very good for this. Usually, by the >time the analysis becomes very deep, the root move is going to stay the same. >Or if it does change, it will take a stupendously long time to resolve it. By >actually choosing the move, it can often become much easier to resolve events >that are fairly far in the future. Here is another fail high of yace. 1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 3.Re1 Bf5 4.Rf1 Kg6 5.Rg1+ Kf7 6.Kh5 Be6 +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:01:57 1839652kN 1.Rg3+ Kh6 2.Rg1 Bd7 +- (1.56) Depth: 32/51 01:41:06 2909299kN 1.Rd1 Be6 2.Rg1+ Kh6 3.Re1 Bd7 4.Rd1 Bc8 5.Rf1 Kg6 6.Rg1+ Kh6 7.Kg3 Be6 8.Kf4 Bd7 +- (1.57) Depth: 32/51 01:55:52 3277019kN (Blass, Tel-Aviv 18.01.2004) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.