Author: Christian Koch
Date: 05:08:24 01/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi @all,
I saw no problems with Fischer bonus for Ruffian!
<tt><pcode>GUI = Winboard 4.2.7
Timecontrol: 8min + 3sec
all 4 pieces Nalimov
CPU = AMD XP 2000+
Enigines so far:
----------------
- Ruffian 2.0.0 with Leiden book - 128 MB hash (book learning on)
- Deep Sjeng 1.5 with own book - 128 MB hash (book learning on)
- Crafty 19.8 with book from Hyatt side - 128 MB hash (book learning on)
- Ktulu 4.2 with own book - 128 MB hash (book learning n.a.)
- SmarTkink 017.a with own book - 128 MB hash (book learning on)
Rating so far: (Crafty's strength set to 2550, only to compare to other
engines)!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op.
Draws
1 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2663 53 55 120 62.9 % 2571 30.8
%
2 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 2613 61 46 120 53.8 % 2587 35.8
%
3 Smarthink 0.17a : 2611 102 76 40 58.8 % 2550 42.5
%
4 Ktulu 4.2 : 2550 54 57 120 41.7 % 2608 26.7
%
5 Crafty-19.8 : 2550 44 49 160 41.6 % 2609 31.9
%
Individual statistics:
1 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2663 120 (+ 57,= 37,- 26), 62.9 %
Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 40 (+ 13,= 17,- 10), 53.8 %
Ktulu 4.2 : 40 (+ 24,= 6,- 10), 67.5 %
Crafty-19.8 : 40 (+ 20,= 14,- 6), 67.5 %
2 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 2613 120 (+ 43,= 43,- 34), 53.8 %
Ruffian 2.0.0 : 40 (+ 10,= 17,- 13), 46.2 %
Ktulu 4.2 : 40 (+ 12,= 16,- 12), 50.0 %
Crafty-19.8 : 40 (+ 21,= 10,- 9), 65.0 %
3 Smarthink 0.17a : 2611 40 (+ 15,= 17,- 8), 58.8 %
Crafty-19.8 : 40 (+ 15,= 17,- 8), 58.8 %
4 Ktulu 4.2 : 2550 120 (+ 34,= 32,- 54), 41.7 %
Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 40 (+ 12,= 16,- 12), 50.0 %
Ruffian 2.0.0 : 40 (+ 10,= 6,- 24), 32.5 %
Crafty-19.8 : 40 (+ 12,= 10,- 18), 42.5 %
5 Crafty-19.8 : 2550 160 (+ 41,= 51,- 68), 41.6 %
Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 40 (+ 9,= 10,- 21), 35.0 %
Ruffian 2.0.0 : 40 (+ 6,= 14,- 20), 32.5 %
Ktulu 4.2 : 40 (+ 18,= 10,- 12), 57.5 %
Smarthink 0.17a : 40 (+ 8,= 17,- 15), 41.2 %</pcode></tt>
On January 18, 2004 at 07:55:53, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>On January 18, 2004 at 07:12:05, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On January 18, 2004 at 06:25:03, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>
>>>On January 18, 2004 at 05:24:43, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>try Ruffian Leiden vs. Shredder 8.0 :-)
>>>Please, without Fischer Bonus and add the results in this forum!
>>>
>>>Have fun with Ruffian!
>>>
>>>Best
>>>Frank
>>
>> Hi Frank
>> In that case you consider Ruffian_Leiden
>> to be stronger than Ruffian_200 and second
>> question: why not Fischer modus (15m+10s).
>> Kurt
>
>
>Hi Kurt,
>
>yes Ruffian 10.10 (Leiden version) is a long time development version in test.
>Ruffian 2.0.0 is very new and it seems that Ruffian Leiden ist stronger.
>
>Fischer modus:
>I believe it's a mistake in Ruffian but I am not sure.
>Will test in in the next times.
>
>Best
>Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.