Author: Reynolds Takata
Date: 20:41:54 11/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 1998 at 07:12:12, Amir Ban wrote: >On November 29, 1998 at 06:50:41, Georg Langrath wrote: > >>Sometimes I feel that all talk about strength is a joke. What is the difference >>between 2450 and 2500 if you are not a very strong player? Nevertheless also I >>am interested in strengthcompare. I think that we are kind of sick. >> >>Now my question. Has anybody played Chessmaster 5500 against Chessmaster 6000. >>In that way it would be possible to find if 6000 has got a stronger engine. >> >> >>Georg > > >Ozso, a veteran computer handle on ICC runs CM5500 and says this in its notes: > >"2: CM6k has stronger books than 55, but a 10% weaker engine" > I have spoken to OZSO in the past, he is on the computer list, not because he applied for an account, but because he was caught illegitimately playing a comp(CM5500) against unwarry opponents(fact not rumor). He said he was running a P400, but he seemed considerably lacking of computer knowledge and computer chess. No offense to OZSO, though i seriously doubt he reads here. Though I have both CM6000, and 5500, I haven't as yet come to conclusions about which is stronger, all i can say now is that they both have spectacular styles, especially using the Pilz/Luebke/Faber settings. >Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.