Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: shredder 8 and weird PVs? (sandro?)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:19:26 01/18/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2004 at 23:10:55, Bob Durrett wrote:

>On January 18, 2004 at 22:39:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 18, 2004 at 05:53:49, martin fierz wrote:
>>
>>>i just received my brand-new shredder 8. when using it for analysis in chessbase
>>>(which is in fact the only thing i use it for), it often gives PVs which are
>>>completely ridiculous - the first few moves are ok, then one side blunders a
>>>piece according to the PV, but the evaluation of that line doesn't show it.
>>>looks like there is a PV bug in shredder 8? is there any fix for this? i find it
>>>very annoying...
>>>
>>>cheers
>>>  martin
>>
>>
>>I have heard that Shredder (and others) try to reconstruct the PV by probing the
>>hash table at the end of the search.  This simply does not work with any degree
>>of accuracy.  IE suppose you search and reach position A while searching the PV.
>> Later, at very shallow depths, you reach position A again and
>>overwrite it with different "best moves" depending on the depth remaining,
>>extensions triggered, etc.  Now when you try to recover the PV from the hash
>>table, you get the right position A, but the wrong best move.  And then the PV
>>looks funny.  It doesn't happen every time, but if the PV is reconstructed
>>enough this way, it happens often enough.  I tried this _years_ ago and ran into
>>the same problem.  Never saw it in debugging.  Saw it regularly when kibitzing
>>PVs on ICC.  :)
>>
>>I now do it the correct way, backing the PV up along with the score...
>>
>>Remember that this is speculation since I have never seen Shredder's source. But
>>recovering the PV in this way is simply going to produce errors, and there is
>>nothing that can be done about it.  The first move and score will be correct, of
>>course.  But beyond that, who knows, and the farther out, the greater the
>>probability of a bogus move.
>
>There was much discussion here about this problem with Shredder 7.04.  You would
>have thought that this would have been corrected it for version 8.0 but maybe
>we'll have to wait until Shredder 8.04.  : (
>
>Bob D.


He might not want to worry with it.  It isn't a tough change, but it is a
change...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.