Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:25:52 01/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2004 at 12:10:49, Ziad Haddad wrote:
>Hi
>A friend tested for me Shredder 8 vs Shredder 7.04 using the Haddad1.2DP5 and
>Master.ctg (available on my homepage).
>I haven't the games yet but it's the first time that my setting is crased in
>such a way against an engine, using these settings.
>
>
>1234567890123456789012345678901234567890
>
>1 Shredder 8 0½½½½½1½1111½111½½½½½½1½1½1½½½½1½½½½½½11 26.5/40
>
>2 Shredder 7.04_Haddad1.2DP5 1½½½½½0½0000½000½½½½½½0½0½0½½½½0½½½½½½00 13.5/40
>
>As usual, the tests have been done in Blitz Time Control 3mn for each engine,
>64Mo Hash, TableBases and Learn Function enabled. You have to notice the great
>number of drawn games =25 +14 -1 for Shredder 8.
>
>I think that this big difference in the result is essentially due to the fact
>that Shredder 8 is much faster than Shredder 7.04. But there isn't a big
>difference between the two engines.
>
>Further tests in 3mn + 2s per engine will certainly be more accurate !!
>
>Other thing, it seems that the Master.ctg Book (or 10moves.ctg Book) fits more
>the style of play of Shredder 8.
Hi Haddad
Give the 5moves.ctg a trial. It's a great book.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.