Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 02:46:03 01/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2004 at 05:21:43, Jouni Uski wrote: >Sorry if this is old topic, but anyway. > >I think we should get off from this "professional" program definition. There are >too much programs considered as professional, but they are not: Junior, Hiarcs, >Ruffian and Deep Sjeng for example. Better is to divide programs to free and >commercial - there is no problem to decide: it You must pay it's commercial. > >Jouni Maybe it's just me, but for me the definition of 'professional' is crystal clear: professional = commercial = making money as a company (ie not shareware/donationware) I guess some people have problems because they somehow value 'professional' higher than 'amateur'. Being in software development for several years I saw quite a lot of people where programming is part of their profession, but I wouldn't want them to code a single line for me. ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.