Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:24:10 01/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2004 at 17:54:29, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On January 19, 2004 at 14:58:41, stuart taylor wrote: > >>from Shredder 8, have one solvable reason. >>If Shredder 8 losses 2-4 to some other program, I might be disappointed, but it >>doesn't mean Shredder isn't the stronger program by far, just that that's what >>happened now. It could even start off with -5 against Fritz 5.32 and then go on >>to win the next 1000 with a further loss (not really,) but when it losses 0-10 >>to Shredder 7.04, that might be a good sign, since not only can that be correct, >>but it might even suggest that a different 2-4 loss might also be wrong. >>If we find the reason, then maybe we can safely depend on a "best" program being >>Shredder 8 (which is what I want to be able to do with one program) >>S. Taylor >> >> >>On January 19, 2004 at 11:27:33, ludicrous wrote: >> >>>Notice how Shredder 8 plays badly after move #25 > > > >It seems to me an awful lot of execuses are being offered for this program But it also has had crushing results in its favour which made it look like what I've been waiting for a long time. -10 HAS to be something wrong, so maybe there are a couple of true excusses which will be corrected. I'll wait for the dust to settle a bit. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.