Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 18:51:45 01/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2004 at 21:35:00, Ed Panek wrote: >On January 19, 2004 at 18:05:35, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 19, 2004 at 16:47:04, Paul Doire wrote: >> >>>On January 19, 2004 at 16:26:57, Paul Doire wrote: >>> >>>>PIII 450, WINSE, 256 RAM >>>>CHESSBASE GUI, 32 MB RAM HASH, >>>>PONDER OFF, FRITZ7.CTG >>>> >>>>Fritz book used for its size other tourneys utilized smaller >>>>higher ELO books. >>>>Also Shredder 704 was using special settings Haddad 1.2DP5, >>>>which I obtained from >>>>http://members.lycos.co.uk/chesslovers/zied/ >>>> >>>>I also ran identical tourney on Celeron 542 Mhz >>>>with Shredder at default. Post to follow. >>>> >>>>Ratings were assigned using Fritz 8 at 2753 per SSDF. >>>> >>>>Top Ten SSDF, Fritz7ctg, Shr1.2DP5 ,5mi 2004 >>>> >>>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >>>>1 Chess Tiger 15.0 2771 +3 *** ½1½ 11½ ½½½ 01½ 0½½ ½11 10½ 101 110 >>>>16.5/27 219.50 >>>>2 Fritz 8 2771 +3 ½0½ *** 0½1 11½ 1½½ ½½0 111 ½½0 11½ 110 >>>>16.5/27 213.25 >>>>3 Deep Fritz 8 2771 +3 00½ 1½0 *** 0½½ ½10 11½ 111 ½11 101 101 >>>>16.5/27 207.75 >>>>4 Ruffian 2.0.0 2714 0 ½½½ 00½ 1½½ *** ½00 ½½1 ½½0 ½11 ½11 ½01 >>>>14.0/27 >>>>5 Shredder 7.04 2703 0 10½ 0½½ ½01 ½11 *** ½01 ½01 ½10 0½½ ½10 >>>>13.5/27 >>>>6 Deep Fritz 7 2681 -1 1½½ ½½1 00½ ½½0 ½10 *** 00½ ½½½ ½½1 ½½½ >>>>12.5/27 169.75 >>>>7 Junior 8 2681 -1 ½00 000 000 ½½1 ½10 11½ *** 0½1 ½½½ 111 >>>>12.5/27 153.00 >>>>8 Hiarcs 9 2658 -1 01½ ½½1 ½00 ½00 ½01 ½½½ 1½0 *** 001 ½½½ >>>>11.5/27 >>>>9 Deep Junior 8 2647 -2 010 00½ 010 ½00 1½½ ½½0 ½½½ 110 *** ½01 >>>>11.0/27 >>>>10 The King 3.23 2635 -2 001 001 010 ½10 ½01 ½½½ 000 ½½½ ½10 *** >>>>10.5/27 >>>> >>>>Average elo: 2703 <=> Category: 19 >>>>gm = 9.72 m = 4.32 >>> >>>Second tournament >>>Shredder 704 default >>>Ratings were assigned using Fritz 8 at 2753 per SSDF. >>> >>>Note Elo top to bottom difference 136 1st tournament >>>Note Elo top to bottom difference 120 2nd tournament >>> >>>Top Ten SSDF, Fritz7ctg,ShredDef, 5min- 2004 >>> >>>Top Ten SSDF, Fritz7ctg,ShredDef, 5min- 2004 >>> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >>>1 Shredder 7.04 2764 +2 *** ½½1 ½½1 11½ 0½½ 10½ ½½½ ½01 11½ 0½1 >>>16.0/27 >>>2 Fritz 8 2753 +1 ½½0 *** 10½ 111 ½11 0½0 010 ½11 1½½ 01½ >>>15.5/27 205.00 >>>3 Hiarcs 9 2753 +1 ½½0 01½ *** ½10 ½½½ 111 ½½0 0½1 110 ½11 >>>15.5/27 201.25 >>>4 Chess Tiger 15.0 2742 0 00½ 000 ½01 *** ½1½ ½½½ 1½1 01½ 111 11½ >>>15.0/27 >>>5 Deep Fritz 8 2730 +1 1½½ ½00 ½½½ ½0½ *** ½½1 10½ 11½ 0½1 101 >>>14.5/27 >>>6 Junior 8 2708 0 01½ 1½1 000 ½½½ ½½0 *** ½1½ 111 10½ 0½0 >>>13.5/27 >>>7 Deep Junior 8 2686 -1 ½½½ 101 ½½1 0½0 01½ ½0½ *** 01½ 00½ 101 >>>12.5/27 >>>8 Deep Fritz 7 2652 -2 ½10 ½00 1½0 10½ 00½ 000 10½ *** ½0½ 111 >>>11.0/27 146.00 >>>9 Ruffian 2.0.0 2652 -2 00½ 0½½ 001 000 1½0 01½ 11½ ½1½ *** ½0½ >>>11.0/27 144.75 >>>10 The King 3.23 2640 -2 1½0 10½ ½00 00½ 010 1½1 010 000 ½1½ *** >>>10.5/27 >>> >>>Average elo: 2708 <=> Category: 19 >>>gm = 9.72 m = 4.32 >>> >>>Looks like Shredder 7.04 Default is stronger per this group of games. >> >> >> >>No, you cannot conclude that. You do not have enough games for any statistical >>evidence. >> >> >> >> Christophe > > >Statistically speaking he can make any conclusion he wishes..its just that his >degree of confidence will be lower. :-) > >Ed I usually refrain from pointing such things. The level of understanding mathematical topics is not high here and pointing such things out does not seem to remedy the situation. For a very similar example to yours, see: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?343165 I usually prefer to just sit back and chuckle. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.