Author: Paul Doire
Date: 08:19:01 01/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2004 at 11:02:58, Bob Durrett wrote: >On January 19, 2004 at 19:42:21, Paul Doire wrote: > >>Games were played on either a 542 Celeron 128 RAM or a 450 PIII 256 Ram >>Win 98SE, Chessbase Gui, 32 MB Ram, 3,4 some 5 man tablebases, Ponder off >>All Games were 5 min Blitz. >>Books used were: 2600.ctg,2700ctg,2700ArturoOchoactg,Fritz7.ctg,10moves.ctg >>Some different parameters were used: >>ChessTiger15 normal and gambit >>Fritz was both 8008 and 80023 >>Shredder 7.04 was default and Haddad1.2DP5 >>The King was default and ran some games with no opk number >>Those games were excluded from the count >> >> THE RANKINGS >>1 Fritz 8 60.1% 77.5/129 >>2 Shredder 7.04 58.1% 75/129 >>3 Deep Junior 8 54.3% 70/129 >>4 Deep Fritz 8 53.9% 69.5/129 >>5 Junior 8 50.8% 65.5/129 >>6 Hiarcs 9 50.4% 65/129 >>7 Chess Tiger 15 49.2% 63.5/129 >>8 Deep Fritz 7 48.8% 39.5/81 >>9 The King 3.23 46.5% 40/86 >>10 Ruffian 2.0 40.7% 46/113 >> >>Based on these games I will conclude in my opinion that Shredder default >>is stronger than Haddad1.2DP5 and that Chess tiger 15 is stronger as Gambit. >> >>This is by no means clear proof of anything except my willingness to play and >>post the results of these games for your enjoyment. >> >>Regards, >>Paul > >If I had played against those engines the results would have the same regardless >of engine. I would have lost 100% to all engines. : ) > >Bob D. I, too, that is why they play and not I.:-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.