Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Ed Schröder about the new Rebel DOS update

Author: F. Huber

Date: 09:36:10 01/20/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2004 at 08:04:55, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On January 20, 2004 at 05:28:53, F. Huber wrote:
>
>>On January 19, 2004 at 19:32:00, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>>[...]
>>>So short answer; not everything is interchangeable.
>>>The .exe file is not interchangeable without weakening Rebel Windows
>>>(new .exe is also pretty large, 7 Mb!)
>>
>>Hi Eelco,
>>
>>you can _forget_ this (large) size (7MB) of the new Rebel.exe -
>>the _real_ code is about 880kB and the rest is simply an overhead of
>>more than 6MB (useless!) zero-bytes!
>>
>>This was also true for the previous Rebel12 versions, and I´ve already
>>reported this mor than once here (and to Ed), but it seems he doesn´t
>>find this bug (?) or wrong setting in his compiler - or he doesn´t mind. :-(
>
>I do mind :)
>
>It is a bug in compiler, the DOS part. Whenever I define an aray it adds the
>size to the executable :) probably because it wants to "zero" the area at
>program start. I have reported the bug so I hope it will be fixed. The bug isn't
>in the Windows part of the compiler.
>
>Hope this explains it.
>
>My best,
>
>Ed

Thanks Ed,

this IS now an explanation, where I understand why you can´t avoid
this huge EXE size.

For me it´s not really a problem - I´ve written a small program which
cuts off this 6MB overhead (but you should know this already ;-))

Regards,
Franz.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.