Author: John Griffin
Date: 15:42:50 01/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2004 at 18:33:25, John Griffin wrote: Ok here are my results now: [d]r3r1k1/q4ppp/B1p1n3/p4R2/4P3/P1Q2PB1/6PP/5RK1 w - - 0 28 New game r3r1k1/q4ppp/B1p1n3/p4R2/4P3/P1Q2PB1/6PP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 New game r3r1k1/q4ppp/B1p1n3/p4R2/4P3/P1Q2PB1/6PP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 8: 1.Rc5 Qxc5+ 2.Qxc5 Nxc5 = (0.03) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 -+ (-2.40) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 1.Kh1 Qxa6 2.Rd1 Red8 3.Bd6 Rxd6 4.Qc1 Rxd1+ 5.Qxd1 Rd8 ± (0.99) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 = (0.18) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 191kN 1.Rf2 Qxa6 2.Bh4 g6 3.Rf6 Rad8 4.Rd2 Qb6+ 5.Kh1 Rxd2 6.Qxd2 = (0.19) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 213kN ² (0.29) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 248kN 1.Bf2 Qxa6 2.a4 g6 3.Rf6 Rad8 4.Qa1 Qe2 5.Re1 Qd2 6.Be3 Qc2 7.Qe5 Qxa4 8.Qd5 cxd5 9.Rxg6+ hxg6 ² (0.30) Depth: 7/25 00:00:00 259kN = (0.02) Depth: 16/30 00:00:55 34009kN (Customer, MyTown 20.01.2004) Thats is waht I get after depth of 16. John (Customer, MyTown 20.01.2004) >On January 20, 2004 at 12:18:20, David Dahlem wrote: >No I do not have a cracked version I have the valid cd And the probelm was like >Anson TJ said I had another program using cpu at at the time and did not realize >it . I have solved the problem and it is playing fine so far I have a match >going between Shredder 8 and Shredder 7.04 at 3+2 and Shredder 8 is winning >+22=27-16. If you people believe I have a cracked version I could care less Is >that what happens when you have a problem here with gui or engines here people >automatically say u have a cracked version or accuse you of stealing the program >its beginning to get a little sad in my opinion. John > >>On January 20, 2004 at 11:29:24, Mihaly Szalai wrote: >> >>>I think it was a cracked engine, so don't waste your time... >>>(If you try to crack the copy protection in Shredder, it will have >>>a limited search depth after 25 moves. Swami complained about it here >>>a time ago...) >>> >>>Mihaly >> >>Yes, i think you're correct. I also remember the Swami complaint about Shredder >>moving instantly after move 25. >> >>Regards >>Dave >> >>> >>>On January 20, 2004 at 10:43:08, Anson T J wrote: >>> >>>>Some of his moves are discarded by Shredder during the ply 1 search. >>>> >>>>I think he had a problem with hash size and available memory, or something else >>>>using the cpu at 99% + >>>> >>>>It would be nice to see the evaluations recorded by his Shredder 8, then it >>>>would be more clear. >>>> >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?343547
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.