Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:10:46 01/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2004 at 18:53:36, Paul Doire wrote: >I have posted all the games right here, and am running more ....all >blitz. Hiarcs is certainly strong...but the best? try hypermodern+aggressiv ON. >The smaller tourneys that those numbers consisted of showed >different winners and Hiarcs was never one of them. that is why i don't believe in those numbers. i have computers too at my home, 2 x 1200 and a few others. and i do play 40/40 and 40/120 normally. and with my notebook i play on the server. but my notebook is not fast. i do normally use hiarcs9 with aggr.+hypermodern ON and it plays very active and interesting games. >Subject: 3-72 game Blitz tourneys 216 games Top Engines > >The last tourney of the three was posted a few days ago. >I wanted to show tourneys together for comparison. >Last 2 played on PIII 450, don't you think that a 450 Mhz PIII is a little SLOW ?? my old amd's 400 are even faster than this PIII. >First played on 542 Celeron, 128MB RAM, WIN98SE, CHESSBASE GUI >First 2 Tourneys PONDER OFF >All were 5 minute blitz 5 minutes blitz on a 450 mhz machine ???? IMO you don't measure the strength of the programs but something different. 5 minutes blitz on a 400mhz machine is IMO a joke. if you would have used this 1998, it would have been ok , i would have complained because of the blitz. but today ??? nothing against you or your hardware. i have 2 400 mhz machines too. but i would not use them for blitz. i would use them for 40/120 and consider the results as blitz results on todays hardware.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.