Author: Jon Mitchell
Date: 00:28:30 01/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
>I do not buy it. > >Ruffian2.0.0 does not play shorter time control or fischer time control in WBEC. >Deep Sjeng1.5 is the winner of that tournament and not Ruffian2.0.0 > >47.5/68 for Deep Sjeng1.5 >only 41.5/68 for Ruffian2.0.0 > >This result does not prove that Deep Sjeng1.5 is worse but at least it proves >that the claim of a clear superiority of Ruffian2.0.0 were premature and if >Ruffian2.0.0 is better than Deep Sjeng1.5 then it is only slightly better. > > >The only question is if Ruffian Leiden is better than Ruffian2.0.0 and we neeed >more information to know(previous results that I read suggested that Leiden is >better). > >Uri Hi Uri, mindboggling, first before releasing,they said Ruffian 2 is improved version of Ruffian Leiden and plays fairly better than Ruffian Leiden now,they are saying "Ruffian Leiden is better than Ruffian 2" PS:Djordje's post wouldnt please us
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.