Author: Jon Mitchell
Date: 01:14:59 01/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2004 at 03:59:37, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On January 21, 2004 at 03:04:36, Jon Mitchell wrote: > >>On January 21, 2004 at 02:34:25, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>On January 21, 2004 at 01:37:51, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>So what's the explanation for this result: >>>Hi Jouni, >>> >>>oh, it's my tournament! >>> >>>I played after this tournament a match: >>>Ruffian 2.0.0 - Shredder 7.04 (174 games) with 40/10 and Ruffian losed with >>>82,5 : 91,5 = 47,41% >>>Shredder losed 2 games on time! >>>Ruffian losed 1 game on time! >>>The same conditions! >>> >>>I don't manipulation my tournaments! >>>If you have interest I can send the Arena log file from this tournament. >>> >>>Shredder have a very good opening book, Ruffian too but I played with book >>>random option by Arena. In my opinion Ruffian is not so strong with shorter time >>>controls and fisher time controls. The results are after all in all, meaning my >>>complete Ruffian results, normaly. >>> >>>Interesting are the results from Deep Sjeng 1.5a too! >>>Very strong games and results by Deep Sjeng! >>> >>>Best >>>Frank >> >> >>Frank, >> >>why do you talk about Deep Sjeng,when Jouni asks your tournament results which >>has Shredder 7.04 and Ruffian 2? > >Hi, > >I like this engine and Deep Sjeng is playing a fantastic tournament! >Interesting the results of Nimzo and Gandalf, Insomniac too. > >You can see that much programs are a lot of improved and older TOP programs are >not under the best engines in this tournament. > >This is great! > >Best >Frank Well,but you should answer to the question of Jouni,you are replying,not posting
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.