Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:00:14 01/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2004 at 13:56:41, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 21, 2004 at 12:25:26, Bryan Hofmann wrote: > >>On January 21, 2004 at 05:02:37, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >> >>>On January 20, 2004 at 21:00:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On January 20, 2004 at 20:38:21, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 20, 2004 at 20:35:32, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>which options did you use for compling Crafty 19.9 >>>>>> >>>>>>/DFUTILITY yes/no >>>>>> >>>>>>/DSINGULAR yes/no >>>>>> >>>>>>/DDETECTDRAW yes/no >>>>>> >>>>>>thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>>Mike >>>>> >>>>>I'm only asking because I use your version as a control version -- and my nodes >>>>>for a given position at a set depth s/b exactly the same... >>>> >>>>/Ox /Og /Ob2 /Oi /Ot /Oy /GT /GL /G6 /GA /D "NDEBUG" /D "WIN32" /D "_CONSOLE" /D >>>>"WINDOWS" /D "EGTB6" /D "NT_i386" /D "FAST" /D "VC_INLINE_ASM" /D "TOXIC" /D >>>>"DETECTDRAW" /D "EPD" /D "_MBCS" /GF /FD /MT /Zp16 /Gy /Fp"Release/crafty.pch" >>>>/Fo".\Release/" /Fd".\Release/" /W4 /nologo /c /Gr >>> >>>Do I conclude correctly that futilty pruning is off? Is there a specific reason >>>for that? >>> >>>Thanks >>>Robert >> >>The FUTILITY code was removed from Crafty 19.9. > >Yes. It was just too darn futile. Also it intereacted with the singular extension code in horrible ways. I have yet to get a SE version I liked, but SE + FUTILITY was ugly to test and debug.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.