Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: sorry you need at least 1000 games to be valid nt. :)

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 17:55:33 01/21/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2004 at 19:20:12, ERIQ wrote:

>.

I think you missed the point of the "1000 games" part. You don't need 1000 games
to prove anything. However, there is a 90-91% chance that Shredder 8 would still
be winning after 1000 games (i.e. "better").

At least according to this nice tool:

http://www.stevemaughan.com/whoisbetter.htm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.