Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: AdamChess & CCT6

Author: José Carlos

Date: 02:56:50 01/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2004 at 16:18:01, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 21, 2004 at 16:01:00, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>On January 21, 2004 at 15:07:35, Thomas Mayer wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Slate,
>>>
>>>>Information about ICC member AdamChess:
>>>> AdamChess is a computer program.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          rating   win  loss  draw total    best
>>>>Blitz       2007     2     0     0     2       0
>>>>Standard    2072     5     0     0     5       0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Ruffian 2
>>>> 2. Hardware: AMD 1400+ 256 MB RAM
>>>> 3. WINDOWS XP
>>>>
>>>>Email: beatthedrums_3@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>well, I was near to ask Will for what reason he wants to disqualify AdamChess,
>>>looking now on the finger notes (which were not there some days ago or so) I
>>>think Will is right.
>>>
>>>Greets, Thomas
>>
>>Well, I might be hallucinating, but I think the Ruffian note was just added
>>after my post.  I also recall some info that said AdamChess was an amateur
>>program written by Adam from New York (maybe in the finger notes).  So,
>>apparently he decided to come clean.
>>
>>To answer your original question, the CCT rules have a provision to disqualify
>>unknown programs.  This is to prevent occurrences like the above, which if not
>>dealt with effectively, would wreck the tournament.  It states:
>>
>>"...Only original programs are allowed and ABSOLUTELY NO CLONES. Most
>>programs are pretty well known by the Computer Chess community and
>>therefore if brand new, unknown program appears I will consult
>>other people to decide its entry in the tournament.
>>ICC reserves the right to decline any application for this
>>tourney."
>>
>>Will
>
>I think we need to come up with some way of making this happen, now, rather
>than later.  I really would not want to be a "referee" that looks at lots of
>source.  But we might find a group of volunteers and let each take
>responsibility for one or two programs, excepting the obvious cases like
>(say) Crafty, where the source is public and _anybody_ can verify whether it
>will play the moves seen in CCT6, etc...
>
>But we do need to do something.  There are some suspicious amateurs on ICC
>that might show up for CCT-6...

  Dann Corbit can do it, if he wants, of course. He's seen a lot of sources from
many programs, including mine, and I trust him blindly to not reveal details. So
I vote for Dann, and will send him my code if it is necessary.
  Note that this has to be done during the tournament, because I might do little
changes or fix some bug between rounds. So if a program behaves suspiciously in
round x, the round x executable plus the round x source code would be needed.
  Sounds a little messy to me, but I accept it if it's the majority's will.

  José C.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.