Author: José Carlos
Date: 11:13:54 01/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2004 at 14:08:42, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On January 22, 2004 at 11:25:26, José Carlos wrote: > >>On January 22, 2004 at 10:33:22, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2004 at 09:56:50, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>Hi Jose, >>> >>>> It is very easy, just say the truth instead of lying. In your web page and in >>>> the CD box put "Untested version of Ruffian. Maybe stronger or maybe not". >>> >>>You forget Ruffian Leiden, maybe my text is not clear enough or your search now >>>for a new story :-) >>> >>>Please read my answers! >>>We test Ruffian versions a long time before the tournament in Leiden started and >>>... Ruffian won the tournament in Leiden! In this case you have not a very good >>>point for a discuss :-) >> >> >> Yes I do. You lie. I denounce it. That's a good enough point. >> >> >>>> Then >>>> not even one customer can complain. >>>> But if you choose to put "strongest winboard program in the world", you'd >>>> better test very well or get ready to millions of complaints. >>> >>>Oh, now the old discuss! >>>I have no other results from WB Ruffian. >>>You can read my comments to this topic in CCC. >>>I will not write every time to the same topic. >>> >>>Please use the search option from this forum! >> >> >> Oh really? Do you really said in the archives that Ruffian 2 was not well >>tested? Mmm, when I search I only see nonsene like "70-100 elo stronger than >>Ruffian 1.0.5" and things like that. Now you admit you didn't test it well, so >>you were lying. Simply. >> >> José C. > >Hi Jose, > >you are good, you find now an other point :-) >I am very interesting for your next point ... lets go! > >Yes, I am sure that the new Ruffian versions (I tested version 2.0.0 and beta >versions of version 2.0.0) You keep contradicting yourself. You say "Ruffian 2 is not enough tested" and also "I tested Ruffian 2 and I'm sure it's stronger...". José C. >are 70 ELO stronger as Ruffian 1.0.5 and 100 ELO >stronger as Ruffian 1.0.0. I believe I am the once of the Ruffian beta testers >in the test phase of this CD which have not so good Ruffian Leiden version >results. At the moment I test a little bit the Leiden version ... > >Sorry, but I have no other results. >Please read the first message in this thread for an example! > >You can find different messages on different webpages (Alex Schmidt, Patrick >Buchmann and others which see ~ 70 ELO more too, or search in my forum for >exactly results. > >I test Ruffian under Arena Chess GUI. >I don't know what the others made ... > >Best >Frank
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.