Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 02:59:05 01/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2004 at 18:42:57, Uri Blass wrote: Hi Uri, >How can you be sure about it after seeing WBEC results? Oh yes, the WBEC tournament is the first tournament which I saw where Ruffian is not on the first position from available WB tourneys. I know how strong is Ruffian with longer time controls: Example (Patrick Buchmann): http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/29097.htm >You can be sure that Ruffian2 performed better in your tests but in order to be >practically sure that it is the best you need more than it including tests at >longer time control. I have enough results Uri, from different user of different machines. You can be sure if I write such a sentence I am sure about it. >You tested it in clearly faster time control than the time control that Leo is >using for his tournaments and also without the original book. You meaning my official test! I have no interest to public all what I make frequently. I have secrets too or I must install a webcam infront of my desk :-) >I also like games without the original books but they are not enough to say that >one engine is better. In fact, Deep Sjeng is very very strong with faster time controls too. Very strong and Per-Ola must do a little bit if Gian-Carlo comes with a new improved version of Deep Sjeng. TheKing is strong too and maybe the new Gandalf. Best Frank
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.