Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:11:07 01/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2004 at 05:59:05, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On January 23, 2004 at 18:42:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >Hi Uri, > >>How can you be sure about it after seeing WBEC results? > >Oh yes, the WBEC tournament is the first tournament which I saw where Ruffian is >not on the first position from available WB tourneys. > >I know how strong is Ruffian with longer time controls: > >Example (Patrick Buchmann): >http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/29097.htm Frank that's just 10 games try this; http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?343809 BTW you never replied to that. Sarah. > >>You can be sure that Ruffian2 performed better in your tests but in order to be >>practically sure that it is the best you need more than it including tests at >>longer time control. > >I have enough results Uri, from different user of different machines. >You can be sure if I write such a sentence I am sure about it. > >>You tested it in clearly faster time control than the time control that Leo is >>using for his tournaments and also without the original book. > >You meaning my official test! >I have no interest to public all what I make frequently. >I have secrets too or I must install a webcam infront of my desk :-) > >>I also like games without the original books but they are not enough to say that >>one engine is better. > >In fact, Deep Sjeng is very very strong with faster time controls too. Very >strong and Per-Ola must do a little bit if Gian-Carlo comes with a new improved >version of Deep Sjeng. > >TheKing is strong too and maybe the new Gandalf. > >Best >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.